• EGYPT \ Aug 31, 2011
    reads 4576
    Could This Christian, Billionaire Art Collector Be The Next President of Egypt? Forbes 29th August 2011
Could This Christian, Billionaire Art Collector Be The Next President of Egypt?
Forbes  29th August 2011


In June, he tweeted a cartoon of Minnie Mouse in a burqa, and Islamists worldwide threatened him with death.

Now, as Egypt wavers between an Islamist and a democratic future, billionaire telecom scion and art patron Naguib Sawiris wants to be his country’s next leader – and he’s founded a political party – the Free Egyptian Party — as he prepares to do just that. According to The Art Newspaper, Sawiris, who stands at number 310 on the Forbes Billionaire list (he’s #2 in Egypt, just behind his father, Onsi, and one ahead of his younger brother), aims not only to establish a secular democratic government in Egypt, but to crown his plans with a national museum that will house his own collection of modern and contemporary art. (Many in the global art world may also recognize him as the one who pledged a $175,000 reward for the return of Van Gogh’s Poppies” stolen from Cairo’s Mahmoud Khalil Museum in August, 2010 – a  museum that also reportedly housed works by other major 19th century masters like Renoir, Gauguin, and Monet.)

Such philanthropy runs in the Sawaris family, which has shown itself to be deeply committed to cultural achievement and the kinds of experimental arts that define a forward-looking, democratic society: Onsi Sawiris’ Sawiris Foundation for Social Development, for instance,  offers annual prizes to young novelists, screenwriters, and playwrights with an eye towards stimulating Egypt’s literary scene – even its more controversial works.

And clearly – given the Minnie Mouse burqa episode — Naguib Sawiris is himself a man unafraid of risk or controversy. A Coptic Christian, he is seeking leadership of his country at a time when Copts have experienced a horrific growth in threats and violence from Egyptian Islamist groups, including a suicide bombing in Alexandria on January 1, in which 21 Christians were killed and 100 injured.  In a subsequent attack this past March, according to Assyrian reports,

A mob of nearly four thousand Muslims has attacked Coptic homes this evening in the village of Soul, Atfif in Helwan Governorate, 30 kilometers from Cairo, and torched the Church of St. Mina and St. George. […]

A curfew has been imposed on the 12,000 Christians in the village.

This incident was triggered by a relationship between 40-year-old Copt Ashraf Iskander and a Muslim woman. Yesterday a “reconciliation” meeting was arranged between the relevant Coptic and Muslim families and together with the Muslim elders it was decided that Ashraf Iskander would have to leave the village because Muslims torched his house.

The father of the Muslim woman was killed by his cousin because he did not kill his daughter to preserve the family’s honor, which led the woman’s brother to avenge the death of his father by killing the cousin. The village Muslims blamed the Christians.

The Muslim mob attacked the church, exploding 5-6 gas cylinders inside the church, pulled down the cross and the domes and burnt everything inside.

That Egypt is not entirely ready for democracy is obvious, given such barbaric behavior.  So why would Sawiris even try?

In part, you might say, because he can: his father’s company, Orascom,  which Naguib runs with his two brothers, is said by Time to be “the largest private employer and largest Egyptian company by market capitalization.” The family firm embraces Orascom Telecom Holding, Orascom Construction, Orascom Hotels and Development, and the recently acquired OTV television network, making him uniquely positioned to oversee – and even to dictate – much of the future infrastructure of Egypt, all while his family reaps the profits.

Yet Sawiris, 57, insists that these are not the reasons for his search for political power; rather, according to a statement cited by the Art Newspaper, he has stated that he “decided to be more focused on social and political work, aiming to play a role in the transformation of a post-revolution Egypt into a civil democracy.”

Political opportunism? Or genuine altruism, a desire to see true democracy in his native land – a desire bolstered by the knowledge that he, by way of his family influence, very possibly has the power to make it work?

I suspect it’s a bit of both; as a collector of challenging, avant-garde art, he has shown himself to be genuinely devoted to new ideas, to the democratic wave that stands behind much of Egypt’s new art scene, and to liberal ideas. Certainly he stands in utter defiance of the Muslim majority and Islamist threat his country now faces, and it is hard to imagine that he, as a leader, would commit the kinds of atrocities perpetrated by Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, who last week ordered a violent attack on Syria’s top political cartoonist, Ali Ferzat, in retribution for an anti-Assad cartoon (Then again, al-Assad is said to have once supported Ferzat’s work; such is the fickle nature of dictators, especially during a crisis in power.)

The truth is, even the powers of his wealth and influence are unlikely to help him win an Egyptian election – even a fixed one. I remain highly doubtful that the so-called Egyptian Spring arose from a mass will for democracy, or that the majority of Egyptians have any desire to see as democratic (let alone secular) future, and certainly not one led by a Coptic Christian and his political party.

But his voice is out there, and the power of his influence assures that other voices soon will join. Already one Egyptian Muslim woman, studying in London, has written admiringly about him and his plans on her blog, “The Romantic Revolutionary.” The promise of a free and liberal Egypt ahead may yet be ahead, one day; and if Sawiris will not be its ruler, he stands to be the man who leads the way.