The Structure of “Reconciling Justice” is a comprehensive exploration of the concept of justice within the Abrahamic religions, particularly in the context of Israel-Palestine. Part one is about Judaism. It examines the concept of justice in traditional Jewish texts, contemporary interpretations of justice within Judaism, and the concept of justice as understood by extremist Jewish groups. Part two evaluates the concept of justice in traditional Islamic then in modern Islamic thought. It also discusses justice in militant Islam. Part three explores the concept of justice in Catholic and Orthodox Christian traditions. It also examines the concept of justice during the times of the crusaders as well as within Christian Zionism. Part four offers two concluding chapters arguing for reconciling justice and its practical implications in Palestine/Israel. 

The Main Argument of “Reconciling Justice”: In the complex context of Israel/Palestine reconciling justice is the most effective and sound model. Several scholars advocated retributive justice; some promoted restorative justice, but reconciling justice is more compatible with divine justice. It advocates healing, forgiveness, and building right relationships in a society. It seeks a form of justice that highlights the right relationship and pursues it through reconciliation. It addresses the perpetrator, the victim, the community, and the diverse relationships that are involved even in the embedded cultural behaviors or habitus. The book investigates the concepts of justice chronologically within the history of the three Abrahamic religions. The investigation employs critical historical studies, sociological analyses, theological discussions, and political engagement. The dominant perception of justice in Judaism is Halakha as well as Tikkun Olam. On the other hand, Islam perceives justice through the lens of Shari’a law. However, the author advocates reconciling justice.

Methodology of the Book: The book employs a multidisciplinary approach to examine the concept of justice within the Abrahamic religions, particularly in the context of Israel/Palestine. The book engages many dialogue partners from diverse cultures engaging different historical periods in Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. It presents a wide spectrum of approaches including social scientific methods, cultural criticism, neuroscience, historiography, ethics, and political theories. Unfortunately, although it seeks to present a theological perception of justice from a Christian point of view, it limits its biblical discussion to mainly the sermon on the Mount.

Contribution of the book: The book makes a significant contribution to the ongoing theopolitical discussions in Israel/Palestine, particularly regarding the concept of justice. Unlike many previous authors (Naim Ateek, Mitri Raheb, etc.) who have focused primarily on political justice Munayer offers a broader perspective that incorporates a thick understanding of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. The contributions of Munayer are warmly welcomed. These contributions pave the way for a better understanding of justice and for an informed inter religious interaction. Such contribution is needed in the context of the current catastrophic realities in Gaza and the rest of the Middle East. It is indispensable for promoting peace in an environment that is shaped by radical forms of religion. Moreover, Munayer is not only a theoretical theologian. He is a practitioner who have been seeking to promote reconciliation for decades. His practical experience is very helpful especially when he gives his own advice to the church.

Opinion: The book is a valuable contribution to the theopolitical and inter religious discourses in the Middle East. While the book offers a comprehensive overview of justice there are few areas that can be strengthened. Admittedly, the book provides and in-depth exploration of Judaism, numerous salient points on Islam, and practical relevance. However, the book’s wide range of topics can sometimes make it challenging to maintain focus. Furthermore, while the book offers a theological perspective, it could benefit from more in-depth exploration of biblical texts related to justice. Overall, "Reconciling Justice" is a valuable resource for anyone interested in the topic of justice and peace in the Middle East. While there are areas where the book could be improved, its strengths significantly outweigh its weaknesses. Munayer's insights and practical experience make this a valuable contribution to the ongoing conversation.